Acting is an art. The stepping stone in the acting industry is learning up your dialogues and being able to deliver them properly. Once you have mastered the art of impressing your memory with dialogues, there comes a greater challenge for you in the industry. Now you need to decide, how you want to portray your character in the play. Here, you need to evaluate the ways of bringing out the character on stage and making it as realistic as possible for the audience.
To simplify this problem of the decision, we bring to you a detailed comparison of method acting and classical acting. Method acting and classical acting are two acting styles that are taken into account before taking center stage. So, choosing a style to showcase your character on the stage will be based on the kind of play and how you want to portray that character in front of the audience.
Scroll through the article, to apprehend the difference between the two styles of acting- method acting and classical acting.
Acumen and Elegance – Classical Acting
Regarded as the style of Shakespeare, classical acting is more seen in the British theatre. If we talk about this kind of acting, the focus of the actors lies on the delivery of line with utmost precision and charm. This does not mean that they are not bothered about acting. They have their own way of being on the stage and showcasing their talent.
This is considered as the major difference between classical acting and method acting, focusing on the actions rather than the emotions. The base of actors from the classical theatre lies in the script. If the script is good, they will deliver the lines with utmost acumen and poise and will interpret the character in their own way.
Thus, they will mold the interpretation of the character according to their understanding and will present it, always liked by the audiences. Although the classical style of acting is a bit unusual as the major focus lies on the delivery of lines, somehow it keeps the audience on the edge of their seats throughout the play, if the script is well-written and the lines are delivered in an authentic style.
Talking about the classical acting, this style came in the theater in the 18th century, when the actors on stage exactly memorized all the lines. The actors were supposed to learn the lines well, so that there is no chance of deviating from the script, as the soul of the show revolved around a well-presented script with exactness.
If we take a look at this style of acting in today’s generation, we might feel that there is a lot of paraphernalia around it. But the thing is that it lets you give an outstanding performance that is mostly loved by the audience. Further, it helps in keeping the interest of the audience intact, throughout the play.
The Aura and the Soul – Method Acting
Shifting our focus on the other style of acting, method acting, it is all about emotions. If an actor follows the pointers of method acting, they have to inject life into a character by adding in emotions. If you consider method acting, the actors follow the rule of sense memory. Here is a very good example for this principle, suppose you have to act for a scene of death or a breakup. Now, it is a painful memory for you.
As an actor, you have to add in a lot of tragic emotions and have to swell up your eyes so that the audience considers that scene to be realistic. So, when the scene is being portrayed, and the actor thinks about a tragic season from his life, he will automatically start getting teary-eyed.
Thus, the scene will look realistic, and the audience will be captivated with the realism. Another thing with method acting is that there is a lot of scope for an actor to improvise in this style. If they showcase their genuine emotions, they will be able to twist it in their style. Whereas, if we talk about the classical style of acting, the showcase of talent of an actor becomes restricted as they have to focus more on the delivery of the script and not on the emotions.
The method acting style was introduced by Lee Strasberg, an instructor at Actors Studio in New York. Lee Strasberg was of the idea that an actor should understand the role completely and fall into that situation. Then only the actor will be able to understand the graveness of the situation and will give an excellent performance.
A lot of actors were able to connect to this thought and tried being in character until their last shot so that they do not lose the essence of the character and the scene. Falling into all of this humdrum, a lot of actors did a lot of unusual things to make this happen. In fact, they used to mold their lifestyle such as dietary habit and sleeping style according to the script. This proved to be really harmful to the actors, as they took the style of acting to great heights and in turn, there was a major impact seen on their real life. While selecting the suitable method acting school in Manhattan, NY selects the one that emphasizes on character building and emotions setting.
In a nutshell, method acting is all about action and classical acting is all about delivery of script. Now, it is up to you to evaluate your strengths and weaknesses and then follow the style that fits the best. Are you a person who is full of emotion, or someone who is really numb and practical in life. It is time to choose a style of acting and frame a decision.
Once you are done with that and are well acquainted with the differences, take up the spotlight, get on the center stage and give your best shot. It is your time to shine and deliver the best performance. It is time to showcase your talent excellently and bring out the actor in you.